Future frameworks releases

Hrvoje Senjan hrvoje.senjan at gmail.com
Tue Jun 9 15:43:28 UTC 2015

2015-06-09 16:58 GMT+02:00 Christian Mollekopf <chrigi_1 at fastmail.fm>:
> Yes, it's a bit more complex, but it's necessary/useful complexity (because
> you gain something from it). It's however still perfectly scriptable.

Can you explain why is it necessary and useful and what do we
(packagers, or users) gain from it?
Size of the libKF5IMAP5 rpm is 172kb(+375 KB for devel package).
IMO users wouldn't object installing 172kb more monthly at the sake of
(they are already confused enough by KF5/Plasma/Apps + kdelibs4-based
libs/desktop/apps splits and versionings)

I understand that you as a maintainer would like to have the right to
determine your version numbers, but i don't understand then why is it
necessary for that lib to be a part of KF5.


More information about the release-team mailing list