okteta binary compatibility

[Friedrich W. H. Kossebau]

Am Donnerstag, 22. November 2012, 15:12:29 schrieb Jonathan Riddell:
> Hi, I've noticed some missing symbols in okteta in 3.9.80 so I think it's
> not binary compatible and should have its soname bumped
> 
>  SONAME: libokteta1gui.so.1
>   #MISSING: 4:4.9.80#
> _ZN6Okteta20OffsetColumnRenderer9setFormatENS_12OffsetFormat6FormatE at Base
> 4:4.7.90 SONAME: libkasten2okteta1controllers.so.1
>   #MISSING: 4:4.9.80#
> _ZN7Kasten210StructTool12setByteOrderENS_21StructViewPreferences13EnumByteO
> rder4typeE at Base 4:4.8.90 #MISSING: 4:4.9.80#
> _ZN7Kasten218StringsExtractTool12setCharCodecERK7QString at Base 4:4.8.90
> #MISSING: 4:4.9.80# _ZN7Kasten220ViewStatusController9fixWidthsEv at Base
> 4:4.8.90

Meh, forgot about these changes. Will see to make it backwards-compatible at 
least, as otherwise I would need to change quite some more stuff. Should be 
fixed during the upcoming WE.

Thanks for the report, Jonathan.

Is there an easy way/tool to check ABI changes myself as developer, so 
packagers can be saved from the need to report such things upstream? 

Cheers
Friedrich