nepomuk-core needs unreleased Soprano

[Sebastian Trüg]

what is a "bus number"?

As for the tcpclient fix: that is perfectly fine. Nobody should be using
that anyway, and if they are they are doing something wrong.

On 05/30/2012 10:24 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 30, 2012 09:15:03 Sebastian Trüg wrote:
>> The new beta1 release is uploaded to SF now. I will add announcements
>> tonight.
> 
> i assume these will be source and binary incompatible with previous releases 
> due to the removal of tcpclient.h from the build.
> 
> i have put in a stub version of tcpclient.cpp that does nothing other than 
> tell the developer not to use it ;) it now builds and should be SC and BC. i 
> pushed this to both master and the 2.8 branch.
> 
> this means we'll need a re-do of the tarballs .. but that's not a big deal.
> 
> so current status is:
> 
> * SC/BC should be restored (though not tested with an automated checker; just 
> took care of the tcpclient issue)
> 
> * we have a branch (2.8) which releases can be pulled from
> 
> ... we should be good to go?
> 
>> Sorry for the delay. I was moving house and had no internet connection.
> 
> yes, this sucks .. what makes me nervous, and should make us all nervous, is 
> this implies that soprano has a bus number of 1. that is not tolerable for a 
> component that so many things in our code relies on. may i suggest that 
> Vishesh be "promoted" to co-maintainer so that he may also take on tasks such 
> as these if you become unavailable? it's still a relatively low bus number of 
> 2, but that's a lot better than 1.
>