Change to tarball generation?

[Wulf C. Krueger]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello Albert et al,

On 23.05.2012 18:58, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> The machine i'm generating the tarballs doesn't have pixz so i'll
> use xz.

Even though it's somewhat coincidental ;): Thank you.

Personally, I think it would be an excellent idea to stick to the
standard xz format until the non-standard extensions that were used
for the last batch of tarballs get standardised themselves.

(Those extensions caused user-visible breakage at least on Exherbo
Linux and Gentoo Linux.)

- -- 
Best regards, Wulf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk+9HiQACgkQnuVXRcSi+5pEuQCferJgyt0sn2pgnhdUcjM5JT0X
PI0AoMcVThO4OlNyW4Fx9JabGQYV7GFx
=mm5E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----