adding kwebkitpart to KDE SC

[Dawit A]

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:38 PM, David Faure <faure at kde.org> wrote:

> On Thursday 29 March 2012 18:33:46 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dijous, 29 de març de 2012, a les 12:10:06, David Faure va escriure:
> > > On Wednesday 28 March 2012 19:38:25 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > > The technical point of view is not enough to guarantee something
> being
> > > > part
> > > > of  the KDE SC, otherwise i could argue the same thing (don't want to
> > > > have
> > > > ugly KDE_VERSION around) for some obscure program only I would use.
> > >
> > > Hmm? This is about a crucial component for konqueror, not about some
> > > obscure program.
> >
> > Why did it went to extragear if it was a crucial component?
>
> Things evolve over time. kwebkitpart works much better than it used to,
> and on
> the other hand, khtml isn't catching up much with today's web. Do you
> really
> want to have a full khtml vs kwebkitpart debate here, or can we just go on
> with "treating both equally, shipping both and letting users choose"?
>
> Dirk wrote:
> > The scripts are as usual in /trunk/kde-common/release,
> > and "dirk reads this" :-)
>
> Hehe. So all we need to do is ensure kwebkitpart has a KDE/4.8 branch and
> then
> add it to modules.git, right? Well at this point it might be a bit late for
> adding to 4.8.4 all of sudden, so maybe we want to do this for 4.9 -- but
> then
> it means someone needs to remember to add it to modules.git at the exact
> right
> moment (after the last 4.8.x release and before the first 4.9.0 alpha)?


Hmm... would it be too late to do this now since we are on 4.9.0 beta-2
already ?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20120615/104d2099/attachment.html>