Fwd: Re: Another RC?, was: Re: Akonadi-Nepomuk Feeder Improvements

[Albert Astals Cid]

I guess this was for the list, not only me

----------  Missatge reenviat  ----------

Assumpte: Re: Another RC?, was: Re: Akonadi-Nepomuk Feeder Improvements
Data: Diumenge, 30 de desembre de 2012, 20:33:09
De: yahoo-pier_andreit 

On 30/12/12 15:08, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Diumenge, 30 de desembre de 2012, a les 01:18:06, Sebastian Kügler va
> escriure:
>> On Friday, December 28, 2012 21:54:17 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>>> Seriously. I know I'm probably just putting my foot in my mouth once more
>>> here, but:
>>>
>>> What are betas and rc's for, if not for stabilizing code and progressing
>>> to
>>> smaller and smaller non-intrusive changes? If you decide do kick out and
>>> replace a large chunk of code between rc1 and rc2, 2 weeks before release,
>>> you may as well re-label the 4.10.0 release "beta1".
>>
>> Maybe we should do that. Vishesh has a patch for Dolphin's filepreviewer
>> that is also waiting, and with the akonadi Nepomukfeeder fixes, we could
>> consider putting another release candidate in, do the actual release three
>> weeks later than planned, BUT ship an SC with much improved Nepomuk, which
>> will probably a lot of users happy. Aside from that, the testing initiative
>> was geared up a bit late this time around, we only announced that in the
>> last RC.
>>
>> Who would be in favour of inserting another RC and three weeks to get
>> Christian's and Vishesh's Nepomuk patches in *and* rockstable? Would it
>> create any timing problems for distros that are going to ship 4.10? How
>> does testing and user feedback look so far, with RC1?
>
> Since people keep adding random code all the time I'm all for it.
>
> Of course, this clearly shows our way of doing releases doesn't work at all.

good job friends, three weeks is a butterfly wing beat compared to 
stability and rockability of akonadi-nepomuk the dinamic duo :-))).
oookkk for another RC :-)

-----------------------------------------