[Kde-pim] Re: KDEPIM 4.6RC2 Tarballs (try #1)

[Vishesh Handa]

Today is apparently not my day. Anyway, I talked to Sebastian. Everything is
fine, and everything will compile. This includes all permutation
combinations.

Everyone can now forget about this huge SDO 0.7 mess.

Sorry for the noise.

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Stephen Kelly <steveire at gmail.com> wrote:

> Vishesh Handa wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Stephen Kelly <steveire at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Vishesh Handa wrote:
> >>
> >> > I haven't tested it but AFAIK 4.6 should NOT be compatible with SDO
> >> > 0.7. If no one
> >> > objects I can backport the fix to kdelibs 4.6.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I'm confused. What patch are you referring to that could be backported
> to
> >> kdelibs? What combination do you say does not work? kdepim4.7 with
> >> kdelibs4.6?
> >>
> >>
> > I'll explain -
> >
> > kdelibs contains the Nepomuk rc-gen which kdepim uses to generate C++
> > classes for the ontologies. The ontologies are generated by looking at
> the
> > .trig files provided by SDO. From SDO 0.7 we have updated the ontologies,
> > and that results in the rc-gen generating C++ classes that do not contain
> > certain public member functions.
> >
> > I patched up the rc-gen in 4.7 so that it would generate those removed
> > member functions ( even though it is not correct from an ontology point
> of
> > view ). kdelibs 4.6 and lower still contain the old rc-gen which would
> not
> > generate all the member functions.
> >
> > So, kdelibs 4.6 along with SDO 0.7 will not be compatible with earlier
> > releases of KDEPIM. The current kdepim release, rc1 I think, contains
> > fixes to not use those removed member functions[1], so that should be
> > fine.
> >
> > Uhm, this is kinda confusing. I think if I just backport that patch, then
> > all permutation combinations should work.
> >
> > [1] http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101336/
> >
>
> You and Sebastian figure it out and tell packagers.
>
> There's no more I can do. I'm just getting more confused because I thought
> the issue was fixed.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
> KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/
>



-- 
Vishesh Handa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20110602/31653455/attachment.htm