KNewStuff questions (uninstalling/providers)
Kevin Krammer
kevin.krammer at gmx.at
Mon Jan 24 20:11:28 CET 2011
On Monday, 2011-01-24, Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > The question is whether this is important enough or not.
>
> If it's a problem then we can skip the 4.6 backport.
> I just thought that it would be nice to have it there
>
> Please tell me about your final decision, whether to do do a backport or
> not. I will then commit my patch from reviewboard (and backport if that's
> wanted).
I guess this is up to the API's maintainer and the release team (CC'ed, see
[1] for context).
> PS: Thanks for CC'ing me :)
Doesn't make sense to keep you out of the discussion, does it? :)
Cheers,
Kevin
[1] http://lists.kde.org/?t=129453537700001&r=1&w=2
--
Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
KDE user support, developer mentoring
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20110124/b9d80aa2/attachment.sig
More information about the release-team
mailing list