Minor Point Relase Policy Draft

[Albert Astals Cid]

A Dilluns, 29 de novembre de 2010, Albert Astals Cid va escriure:
> A Diumenge, 28 de novembre de 2010, Jonathan Riddell va escriure:
> > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 04:28:23PM +0000, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > A Diumenge, 28 de novembre de 2010, Jonathan Riddell va escriure:
> > > > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 04:16:47PM +0000, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > > > > http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Minor_Point_Release_Policy/Draft
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes the problem is that the policy contradicts what we are doing in
> > > > > reality. That's why there wasn't consensus.
> > > > 
> > > > So improvements welcome, it's a wiki :)
> > > 
> > > I thought you *needed* it to be exactly like that to convince "your
> > > bosses" at ubuntu to let you ship updates as part of the stable updates
> > > or something, if we change it to reflect reality I guess it won't be
> > > acceptable.
> > > 
> > > But if you want I can update it with what i think is what we are doing
> > > now.
> > 
> > That was my reason for starting on it but I think it would be a good
> > thing for KDE to have generally and I think it should be influenced
> > but not dictated by our downstreams, and it's pointless if it doesn't
> > reflect reality.  So please do edit and see if consensus can be found.
> 
> I did some edits.
> 

So did anyone have a look at my edits to that page? Do they make sense for 
you? It's something we could agree on?

Albert

> Albert
> 
> > Jonathan
> > _______________________________________________
> > release-team mailing list
> > release-team at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
> 
> _______________________________________________
> release-team mailing list
> release-team at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team