sebas at kde.org
Tue Jun 1 13:46:03 CEST 2010
On Tuesday 01 June 2010 13:22:22 Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
> On Monday 31 May 2010 22:47:53 Allen Winter wrote:
> > On Monday 31 May 2010 10:10:13 am Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
> > > On Monday 31 May 2010 15:36:42 Allen Winter wrote:
> > > > Do we want to make a 4.4.5 release?
> > > >
> > > > Seems like we could make a 4.4.5 in late June, since 4.5.0 is due
> > > > early August.
> > >
> > > hmmm will we have any commits for it?
> > >
> > > Was 4.4.4 tagged already? I saw on websvn.kde.org.tags that it was...
> > > not sure how can one be aware of this, I committed a bug fix yesterday
> > > but obviously I have to push it in the changelog for 4.4.5...
> > > Is the communication working properly? Are devels aware on why 4.4
> > > branch is important? Is 4.4.5 important for distros?
> > Well, if we make a decision and make one quickly, I can send out some
> > emails, make a blog post, etc.
> > kdepim has several important bug fixes that could be included in a 4.4.5.
Which makes me think, do we want to stall support for the non-Akonadi PIM right away
when the Akonadi-based PIM is released? I think an opt-in scheme would make sense
here, given that it's a pretty grave move and also bears some risks for acceptance.
This depends on wether we are actually able to support it, of course. (Though distros
that have promised support for it would surely be happy.)
> I am all for a 4.4.5
> I'd certainly like to raise more awareness from developers about it. Maybe
> we could stress that this will be the last 4.4 release and that
> distributions will likely use it for a while.
Yes, or at least make sure people know that 4.5.6 *might* not happen. :)
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
More information about the release-team