Qt MathML Widget

[Aleix Pol]

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 3:27 PM, John Tapsell <johnflux at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2009/3/20 Aleix Pol <aleixpol at kde.org>:
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Allen Winter <winter at kde.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Howdy,
> >>
> >> I assume we are all following the "Qt MathML Widget" discussion on
> k-c-d.
> >> Ideas on that issue?
> >>
> >> My first thought was sourceforge with some folks to maintain it there.
> >>
> >> kdesupport is basically the same as sourceforge, but somewhat easier
> >> to deal with.
> >>
> >> Would kdelibs be ok? doesn't feel "right" to go there, but I won't
> object
> >> if someone claims maintainership there.
> >>
> >> ??
> >>
> >> --
> >> Allen Winter | Software Engineer | 1-888-872-9339
> >> KDAB, Inc. | "Platform-independent software solutions"
> >> http://kdab.com | 1-866-777-5322 (US) | +46-563-540090 (Sweden)
> >
> > Referring to what thiago macieira said on the k-c-d list, I think that he
> > has his point.
> > We should only put it in kdelibs if we're forking it (what are your plans
> > john?) and renaming it.
>
> I think we almost certainly want to do this, and encourage people to
> expand on it.
>
>
> >
> > Otherwise I'd be fine if it is in a separate library in kdesupport, but
> > since they don't ensure ABI stability i'm not sure whether that would be
> a
> > good idea.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Aleix
> >
> > PS: I'm not on this list, CC me if tehre is any other message on this
> > subject please.
> >
>

Wouldn't it be a better idea to keep the work on KFormula? we don't want 2
KDE codes doing the same thing!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20090320/a698ad0d/attachment.htm