kdesupport changes

[Tom Albers]

At Sunday 14 September 2008 22:38, you wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 September 2008 19:06:36 you wrote:
> > On Sunday 07 September 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
> > 
> > > > development branch of Eigen be a place where we can experiment and
> > > > break stuff without affecting our users. So, I support your plan.
> > > There seems to be another set of kdesupport developers who
> > > rely on the KDE folks to help test their stuff in-progress, just
> > > like any other KDE code.  Hence the push-back on this idea.
> > 
> > Pardon, I've not seen any pushback on this mailing list.
> 
> The pushback happened on k-c-d.
> I think that's a valid list for us to discuss these types of issues.
> 
> > can we ask that set of kdesupport developers to voice their concerns and their
> > suggestion on this mailing list as part of the discusison so that we can move
> it
> > forward, instead of deciding something and then not retract it afterwards
> because
> > of some pushback?
> > 
> I wasn't aware that we had made a decision.  I thought we were in
> discussion-mode.
> In the meantime, dfaure's proposal (snippet below) looks good.  I think this is
> basically
> what many of us have suggested but for some reason the simplicity got lost in
> the noise.
> Should we also commit a tags/kdesupport-for-4.1/CMakeLists.txt file so folks can
> easily build all of the kdesupport-for-4.1 stuff in 1 easy step?
> 
> dfaure writes:
> Here's what I have in mind:
> tags/kdesupport-for-4.1/
> tags/kdesupport-for-4.1/phonon/    (svn cp'ed from tags/phonon/4.2.0)
> tags/kdesupport-for-4.1/strigi/    (svn cp'ed from tags/strigi/strigi/0.5.11)
> tags/kdesupport-for-4.1/qca/    (svn cp'ed from tags/qca/2.0.1)
> etc.
> Yes, just for convenience. Because nobody can remember 10 version numbers
> that keep changing, for things he's not working on :-)
> 

+1

Toma