ogoffart at bepointbe.be
Sat Jan 12 12:44:41 CET 2008
Le jeudi 10 janvier 2008, Riccardo Iaconelli a écrit :
> On Jan 10, 2008 7:50 PM, Allen Winter <winter at kde.org> wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 January 2008 13:42:50 Urs Wolfer wrote:
> > > On Thursday 10 January 2008 19:29:39 Stephan Binner wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 10 January 2008 15:37:33 Allen Winter wrote:
> > > > > The kwallet seems like a critical app that should always be
> > available
> > > > > in our base system.
> > > >
> > > > More critical than kmix? :-) Wanting to say, kmix belongs there too
> > imo.
> > > Yes, I agree. Both kwalletmanager and kmix belong to kdebase.
> > > I think kdebase/runtime would be the correct place for these.
> > I suggested kdebase/apps instead of kdebase/runtime because
> > moving anything into runtime causes a co-installability issue
> > that I'm sure one of the packagers will yell about.
> > But either one of those locations is better than kdeutils IMO.
> Agreed, and personally I'm for kwallet in runtime/, it is a runtime
> dependency to me,
> while kmix can probably fit well into apps/.
KMix is a muldimedia application, and so belongs to kdemultimedia.
> > I almost think that ark, kcalc, kgpg, kfloppy, and sweeper
> > could go into kdebase as well.
> Agreed for ark (it's a shame that we don't have an unzipper in a basic
KDE is the set of all applications in every modules. And a basic installation
would include all main modules.
I would say it is a shame to don't have a mail client in a basic installation.
for me, ark can stay to kdeutils.
> but not for the other ones, they belong to kdeutils IMHO (that's why the
> module exist).
IMO, we should not try to move things to kdebase, but maybe even the other
Just my 2 cents.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20080112/81713547/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the release-team