kdeutils cleanup

Andras Mantia amantia at kde.org
Fri Apr 18 18:12:51 CEST 2008

On Friday 18 April 2008, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> I guess we agree that every program should have some kind of active
> maintainer, some people who feel responsible for it and have
> sufficient knowledge about it, if it is included in a KDE module.

This would be the ideal world. But even kdelibs has code that does not 
have any active maintainer, and I'm sure that is true for other code in 
other modules.
If the application works, doesn't have any serious reported bug, there 
is not need to move to unmaintained. I'd actually be sad if such thing 
Of course if it doesn't even compile, it is unusable or such and nobody 
cares about it, it can be moved away.


Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20080418/1e7ca292/attachment.pgp 

More information about the release-team mailing list