Release schedule clarifications

[Allen Winter]

On Tuesday 23 October 2007 06:50:19 pm Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 October 2007 23:17:27 Allen Winter wrote:
> >
> > Regarding the proposed RC1:
> >  1) we just managed to get Beta3 out the door last week.
> >  2) according to [1] "... The Beta Cycle will continue until the critical
> > products are determined to be functional (the "minimum requirements"). The
> > progress can be seen [2]..."
> 
> Is [2] up to date?
> 
probably pretty close.
toma usually nags each of the responsible persons a few days
before the next tagging.  toma, can you prepare your next nag please? :)

> > So I think we'll probably have to call the next release Beta4.
> 
> We could rename the release to Beta4. But I would suggest to keep the freezes 
> as defined and cut off one RC, so that the plan for the final release stays 
> the same (at least for now).

Sure.  I'm arguing for a name change: RC1 => Beta4.
It seems that Shakespeare was wrong:  "...a rose by another name would NOT smell as sweet..."

> 
> > [1]
> > http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.0_Release_Roadmap#Milestone:_Relea
> >se_Candidate_Cycle [2]
> > http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.0_Release_Beta_Goals
>