Questions About the New Schedule

[Sebastian Kügler]

On Monday 01 October 2007 10:37:06 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 01.10.07 06:30:25, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > On Saturday, 8. September 2007, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > > 5)  Should language bindings be part of the development platform?
> > > > Richard Dale says "Python and Ruby in good shape by late October, and
> > > > possibly C# too."
> > >
> > > If Richard says he can do it, i say we can try it :-)
> >
> > Thats not enough. somebody has at least to be able to confirm that the
> > bindings *compile*. right now, kdebindings does not compile, and after I
> > spent an hour or so looking, I'm sure that it can not compile for anyone
> > at all, given the fundamental bugs in the build system.
> >
> > it is my understanding that Richard uses a completely different build
> > system to maintain the bindings, at least thats what he used to do in
> > KDE3 times. There has to be at least somebody who maintains the official
> > build system, and that person has to be != me.
>
> Same thing applies to the python bindings, but those are not buildable
> with cmake and I don't see why they should be.

I understand that Simon Edwards is working on making them compile with cmake. 
Simon, can you give us an update about the python bindings? How stable are 
they? 
-- 
sebas

 http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org |  GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20071001/8c5ec168/attachment.pgp