On Wednesday, 7. March 2007, Stephan Kulow wrote: > Kind of. KDE 2.0 was late, KDE 3.0 crap. Pick your poison :) Well, if you call KDE 3.0 crap, then 2.0 was a desaster. I think 3.0 was better scheduled than 2.0, and 2.0 was more than over a year late. Well, needless to say that 4.0 is already a year late. Dirk