[rekonq] gsoc idea!

Mayank Jha mayank25080562 at gmail.com
Sun Mar 9 15:16:25 UTC 2014


Hey, I was wanting to know if the extension feature is done, or still
pending. Can I work on it for this summer ?


On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:45 PM, andrea diamantini <adjam7 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> while the techbase page needs updating, you may have heard on the internet
> that extensions support is planned for rekonq 3.0. This means that work
> about will start in a month or so, after last 2.x stable release.
> I started months ago working on Nikhilm code (the one stopped in 2010) and
> I'll be able to publish a first development branch as soon as I can
> properly clean up and rebase it. As said, in a month or so.
> I'll be happy having help on that branch, "extending" extensions support
> or implementing "test extensions" to. But due to work and real life I
> really cannot mentor any GSOC this year, sorry.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> 2013/3/31 Richard llom <richard.llom at gmail.com>
>
>> Mayank Jha wrote:
>> > I was going through the idea of adding support for chrome extensions
>> into
>> > rekonq! and I talked to Nikhil Marathe (who had worked on it before), he
>> > told me that he could not carry on with the work as there were some
>> > problems due to differences in the two webkit ports. Are you currently
>> > working on this to remove differences between QtWebKit and Chrome webkit
>> > ports?
>> >
>> Me? No.
>>
>> > https://www.gitorious.org/~adjam/webkit/kde-qt-webkit I thought we
>> > could start off with incorporating user scripts instead of chrome
>> > extensions as mentioned in the extensions page of rekonq/kde/.. Are
>> there
>> > any similar problems in doing this?
>> >
>> I would /guess/ not, but I don't really know. A quick look up:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greasemonkey#Equivalents_for_other_browsers
>> might give some insight.
>>
>> Another thing which pops to my mind on cross browser extensions are user-
>> supplied style sheets: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stylish
>>
>>
>> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Richard llom wrote:
>> >
>> >> mayank wrote:
>> >>> Well, I had an idea of introducing Rekonq-extensions, thus enabling
>> the
>> >>> users to add and contribute extensions to the rekonq browser, ...
>> >> See also:
>> >> http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/rekonq/Extensions
>> >> and
>> >> http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/rekonq/Roadmap#Next_BIG_targets
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rekonq mailing list
>> rekonq at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Andrea Diamantini
> WEB: http://www.adjam.org
>
> rekonq project
> WEB: http://rekonq.kde.org
> IRC: rekonq at freenode
>
>


-- 
Mayank Jha
http://mjnovice.wordpress.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20140309/f6035647/attachment.html>


More information about the rekonq mailing list