[rekonq] Review Request: Rekonq Migration to Nepomuk2

[David Narváez]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108152/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for rekonq and Vishesh Handa.


Description
-------

As we move forward with Rekonq 2  I think it is a good opportunity to jump to Nepomuk2. I had to copy some models that are not (yet?) available in Nepomuk2 and I'm including Vishesh who knows best about the migration process.


Diffs
-----

  CMakeLists.txt 11015c5 
  config-nepomuk.h.cmake fe7364f 
  src/CMakeLists.txt 143f9dc 
  src/bookmarks/bookmarkowner.h 6a18c23 
  src/bookmarks/bookmarkowner.cpp ba2d8f6 
  src/bookmarks/bookmarkscontextmenu.cpp 69cde75 
  src/nepomuk/utils/nepomukutils_export.h PRE-CREATION 
  src/nepomuk/utils/resourcemodel.h PRE-CREATION 
  src/nepomuk/utils/resourcemodel.cpp PRE-CREATION 
  src/nepomuk/utils/simpleresourcemodel.h PRE-CREATION 
  src/nepomuk/utils/simpleresourcemodel.cpp PRE-CREATION 
  src/urlbar/bookmarkwidget.h 39f6fbd 
  src/urlbar/bookmarkwidget.cpp e266a07 
  src/urlbar/newresourcedialog.h 651c631 
  src/urlbar/newresourcedialog.cpp 39cffc3 
  src/urlbar/resourcelinkdialog.h e628aa1 
  src/urlbar/resourcelinkdialog.cpp 799171f 

Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108152/diff/


Testing
-------

1. Tagged a bookmark using Rekonq 2 before this patch
2. Recompiled and reinstalled Rekonq 2 with this patch
3. Confirmed the old bookmark is kept, with the correct tags
4. Added a new bookmark and tagged it
5. Checked that both tags are available in the tag dialog elsewhere in my KDE Desktop


Thanks,

David Narváez

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20130104/4b0f7286/attachment.html>