[rekonq] Review Request 109613: Save your browsing sessions with rekonq
mayank jha
mjnovice at gmail.com
Mon Apr 1 17:37:27 UTC 2013
> On March 30, 2013, 5:25 p.m., Andrea Diamantini wrote:
> > src/history/historymanager.h, line 97
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109613/diff/1/?file=120601#file120601line97>
> >
> > why this? Are you aware this will completely break previous history?
>
> mayank jha wrote:
> I was trying to save each session separately irrespective of the history. is that okay?
>
> Andrea Diamantini wrote:
> well... no and no! Please, read the code you are going to modify.
oops! history has nothing to do with this! my bad!
- mayank
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109613/#review30156
-----------------------------------------------------------
On March 20, 2013, 4:54 p.m., mayank jha wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109613/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated March 20, 2013, 4:54 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for rekonq.
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> A patch which allows you to save and later reload your important browsing sessions!
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/history/historymanager.h a618c67
> src/history/historymanager.cpp 2fab9cf
> src/sessionmanager.h 6d6bef2
> src/sessionmanager.cpp 8c78172
> src/webwindow/rekonqui.rc 90c5c19
> src/webwindow/webwindow.h b2e0f5a
> src/webwindow/webwindow.cpp 1225fb0
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109613/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> works fine!
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> mayank jha
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20130401/2c0ae461/attachment.html>
More information about the rekonq
mailing list