[rekonq] Rekonq 1.2 && Rekonq 2.0

[andrea diamantini]

Well, we are really NOT maintaining a fork of webkit. Digia is. My summer
project about closed when they decide to continue maintaining for some more
time the Qt4/Webkit1 branch.

Regards,

2012/10/3 Alex Fiestas <afiestas at kde.org>

> On Wednesday 03 October 2012 08:22:32 Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:32:41 PM andrea diamantini wrote:
> > > QtWebkit2 is for Qt5.
> >
> > Also there will be major non compatible API changes.
> >
> > > Anyway, please consider that it is not a multiprocess solution in the
> > > "chrome" sense (one process per tab), but in the "safari" one (2
> processes
> > > per instance, one doing the rendering stuffs, the other one for the UI)
> >
> > Interesting.
> >
> > I'd prefer to see process per tab solutions be done at the app level
> rather
> > than at the toolkit. Better control and less compatibility issues that
> way.
>
> Just to be clear, my concern is not about the "rendering out of process" or
> the "multi process", my concern is having to maintain a fork of webkit.
>
> Web evolves super quick and we should be fast enough to be up to date.
>
> WebGL, html5, etc.
> _______________________________________________
> rekonq mailing list
> rekonq at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
>



-- 

Andrea Diamantini
WEB: http://www.adjam.org

rekonq project
WEB: http://rekonq.kde.org
IRC: rekonq at freenode
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20121003/b1438f13/attachment.html>