[rekonq] Review Request: GCI Task : Remove Two Actions From Tabs' Context Menu

Furkan Üzümcü furkanuzumcu at gmail.com
Mon Jan 9 20:15:16 UTC 2012



> On Jan. 9, 2012, 6:11 p.m., Andrea Diamantini wrote:
> > Code seems ok now, but I tested your patch and I cannot really understand why we should apply such changes. Chromium and Firefox both show such actions in tabbar contextual menu, so I think you should spend some words to explain why you are suggesting such changes.

"Open Last Closed Tab" and "Closed Tabs" actions are in both empty are context menu and tab context menu. User doesn't need it in both places just one is enough. For Chromium, it doesn't have the same actions in both areas. I think this takes up too much space and doesn't really seem good, imho.
Actually I just reconsidered the new tab context menu it's not really needed. But, it's ok if we have it though. :)


- Furkan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103451/#review9669
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 7, 2012, 2:28 p.m., Yusuf TEZCAN wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103451/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 7, 2012, 2:28 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for rekonq.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Removed the "Open The Last Closed Tab" and "Closed Tabs" actions and set ""New Tab"" button's context menu to the empty area context menu on TabBar.
> I am a GCI-Student who wrote this patch.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mainview.cpp 6285159 
>   src/tabbar.cpp 4834095 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103451/diff/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yusuf TEZCAN
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20120109/2895c68f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the rekonq mailing list