[rekonq] Re: Review Request: This is JuniorJob about doing better Tab Previews

[Tirtha Chatterjee]

> On July 13, 2011, 11:26 a.m., Tirtha Chatterjee wrote:
> > haha, that kind of puts the blame on me ;-) Yes, even i was not sure, so i thought posting on reviewboard would be best to know the answer.
> 
> Vyacheslav Blinov wrote:
>     I didn't meant that, I just wanted to point that I wasn't shure about that too. Sorry

come on notice the smiley above. i was just having fun :-)


- Tirtha


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101848/#review4672
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 13, 2011, 11:11 a.m., Vyacheslav Blinov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101848/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 13, 2011, 11:11 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for rekonq.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Improvements:
> 
> * title of the page is removed since it is visible on a tab.
> * widget now has a smooth 3d look'n'feel with Oxygen thanks to raisen frame
> * widget has rouned corners in all the styles
> * url of the page is elided
> * with compositing tab previews will be shown semitransparent with 25% alpha by default, witch can be setted to be optional later
> * code of tab preview is now separated from tab bar so it is more explicit
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt db9506a 
>   src/tabbar.h c1b0ba5 
>   src/tabbar.cpp dee49ea 
>   src/tabpreviewpopup.h PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tabpreviewpopup.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101848/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested with different styles: it still looks ok, without compositing transparency didn't works
> 
> 
> Screenshots
> -----------
> 
> sample of tab preview
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101848/s/193/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vyacheslav
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20110713/e303b348/attachment.htm