[rekonq] Re: Review Request: Items in the completionlist are sorted by visit count instead of last visit date

[todd rme]

On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Benjamin Poulain <ikipou at gmail.com> wrote:

>    This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100396/
>    src/history/historymanager.h<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100396/diff/1/?file=7140#file7140line79> (Diff
> revision 1)
>
> public:
>
>   79
>
>         return dateTime > other.dateTime;
>
>  79
>
>         return visitCount > other.visitCount && dateTime > other.dateTime;
>
>   Just an idea...
> What about a weigthed sum of both to determine the order?
>
> With an absolute measure of either one you can end up in those situations:
>
> priority visit:  a web site visited 3 times 2 months ago will appear before something you saw yersterday
> priority date: something you saw yesterday appear before something you look every day
>
> So it might be nice to take both into account?
>
>
> - Benjamin
>
> On January 15th, 2011, 8:23 p.m., Lionel Chauvin wrote:
>   Review request for rekonq.
> By Lionel Chauvin.
>
> *Updated Jan. 15, 2011, 8:23 p.m.*
> Description
>
> Items in the completionlist are sorted by visit count instead of last visit date
>
>   Diffs
>
>    - src/history/historymanager.h (a4099de)
>
> View Diff <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100396/diff/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rekonq mailing list
> rekonq at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
>
>

Another possibility would be to have each visit weighted by how long ago it
was, so more recent visits count more than visits a long time ago.  So 1
visit today would count more to the ranking than 20 visits a year ago.  It
would probably be something like an exponential decay, so something you just
visited a few minutes ago would be ranked very highly, while there wouldn't
much difference between a site you visited 3 years ago and a site you
visited 4 years ago.

-Todd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20110115/53628cea/attachment-0001.htm