[rekonq] Re: Using git for review

[Andrea Diamantini]

On Wednesday 05 January 2011 15:46:22 Benjamin Poulain wrote:
> 
> Review board is oriented diff, what we need is something capable to
> handle branches.
> 
> Big changes on git are usually made of dozens of commit. Reading through
> those commits gives you a better picture of the changes. Reviewboard
> does not give such things.

I'm aware that reviewboard will never probably be 100% ok with git. I'm just 
saying that having it to "review the big picture" + having an automatic way to 
pull the remote request in a local branch seems enough to me.

> You are assuming the sysadmin are willing to improve the process. Are
> they part of a project using git so they can see the pain of the process
> by themself?

Yes. Obviously they will have more time to when all KDE core modules will be 
moved to git. (That is, after 4.6 release?)

> I am not into politics, I don't really care where the code is hosted. I
> would rather have something that works :)

It's ok, I understood your intentions. The unique thing "politically oriented" 
I said anyway is that I feel part of the KDE community and I'd like rekonq 
being part of the SC.

-- 
Andrea Diamantini, adjam
GPG Fingerprint: 57DE 8E32 7D1A 0E16 AA52 59D8 84F9 3ECD DBF9 730F

rekonq project
WEB: http://rekonq.kde.org
IRC: rekonq at freenode
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20110105/1a69a1f6/attachment.htm