[rekonq] About Rekonq doc

[Panagiotis Papadopoulos]

On Sunday 05 September 2010 23:46:09 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Dissabte, 4 de setembre de 2010, Albert Astals Cid va escriure:
> > A Divendres, 3 de setembre de 2010, andrea diamantini va escriure:
> > > The sense here is just that working on git(orious) allows us to have a
> > > lot of occasional contributors.
> > > The docs as example has been mainly written by two-three guys with just a
> > > 2 days work (and 2 commits each).
> > > And I cannot remember more than that from them.
> > > Just to clarify: there are probably 20-30 people around the "so called
> > > rekonq project". But just 2-3 of them have a kde (git, svn) account.
> > > I can say to anyone (and I do) to ask for an account, but numbers are the
> > > ones I said.
> > > So, I need a way to manage all contributions coming from them. This way
> > > is the "merge request". It works really well here.
> > > What I proposed here is a place to collect these merge requests.
> > > On the other side, I understand your needs to manage in the easiest way
> > > possible this sort of things. So, I really don't know what's the best
> > > thing to do.
> > > Probably, leaving docs untranslated? :)
> > 
> > No way.
> > 
> > > Helping Albert to improve the scripty kid for git?
> > 
> > Seems that not as easy as i thought, see my last mail to scm mailing list
> 
> Actually, i got that script working, unfortunately gitorious doesn't support 
> the features we need to make it work, so it will have to wait until rekonq 
> moves to git.kde.org.
> 
> So i'd suggest you manually sync the docs to the right place in svn ofr the 
> time being.
> 
> Albert
>

Done: r1173026.
I did not modify the CMakeList.txts though, (e.g. adding the rekonq subdir into the CMakeList.txt). Is this something I should do too?