[rekonq] Re: Review Request: update the completion list when the user switch search engine
Andrea Diamantini
adjam7 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 27 23:04:13 CET 2010
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100236/#review633
-----------------------------------------------------------
src/urlbar/completionwidget.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100236/#comment461>
Please, use Q_FOREACH instead
src/urlbar/listitem.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100236/#comment462>
Is this really necessary? Comments, please.
src/urlbar/listitem.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100236/#comment463>
Not sure I understood what happened with the extractQuery function.. :)
- Andrea
On 2010-12-23 16:15:20, Lionel Chauvin wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100236/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2010-12-23 16:15:20)
>
>
> Review request for rekonq.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> update the completion list when the user switch search engine
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/opensearch/opensearchmanager.h df8e536
> src/opensearch/opensearchmanager.cpp 4ee1de3
> src/opensearch/searchengine.cpp 92b3293
> src/urlbar/completionwidget.h 6545b11
> src/urlbar/completionwidget.cpp 087a10a
> src/urlbar/listitem.h 0d66a12
> src/urlbar/listitem.cpp d82613f
> src/urlbar/urlresolver.h e6ca770
> src/urlbar/urlresolver.cpp 864eca0
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100236/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lionel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20101227/9aa66a02/attachment.htm
More information about the rekonq
mailing list