[rekonq] Re: Review Request: update the completion list when the user switch search engine

Andrea Diamantini adjam7 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 27 23:04:13 CET 2010


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100236/#review633
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/urlbar/completionwidget.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100236/#comment461>

    Please, use Q_FOREACH instead



src/urlbar/listitem.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100236/#comment462>

    Is this really necessary? Comments, please.



src/urlbar/listitem.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100236/#comment463>

    Not sure I understood what happened with the extractQuery function.. :)


- Andrea


On 2010-12-23 16:15:20, Lionel Chauvin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100236/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-12-23 16:15:20)
> 
> 
> Review request for rekonq.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> update the completion list when the user switch search engine
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/opensearch/opensearchmanager.h df8e536 
>   src/opensearch/opensearchmanager.cpp 4ee1de3 
>   src/opensearch/searchengine.cpp 92b3293 
>   src/urlbar/completionwidget.h 6545b11 
>   src/urlbar/completionwidget.cpp 087a10a 
>   src/urlbar/listitem.h 0d66a12 
>   src/urlbar/listitem.cpp d82613f 
>   src/urlbar/urlresolver.h e6ca770 
>   src/urlbar/urlresolver.cpp 864eca0 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100236/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lionel
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20101227/9aa66a02/attachment.htm 


More information about the rekonq mailing list