[rekonq] Awsome Bar: Organization Ideas

Andrea Diamantini adjam7 at gmail.com
Mon Aug 3 10:44:33 CEST 2009


On Monday 03 August 2009 10:25:46 Lionel Chauvin wrote:
> > My problem with 3rd part is that the first two could retrieve so much
> > sites that having more runners will add just confusion (too much
> > choices!)
>
> For me the 3rd parti is very useful for the user.
> But we can add Runners one by one and see what must be keeped.

Yes, it's surely very useful. But the first two are "crucials". So I'm saying 
just let's see what happens.. 

> > PS: don't know what GoogleTOS is, but I think that GoogleRunner will be
> > one of the most useful rekonq's awesome bar runners. So it has to be
> > here.
>
> I think my idea must be revised.
>
> We can't use results of google and agreggates them with other results. It
> is in the Google term of service of  (TOS).
>
> "5.3	You agree not to access (or attempt to access) any of the Services by
> any means other than through the interface that is provided by Google,
> unless you have been specifically allowed to do so in a separate agreement
> with Google."
>
> Perhaps we can do it in an other way. The user types a request, go to 
> google website. The page is cached and parsed. The parsed data will be used
> for next requests.
>
> In this way the user access through the interface provided by google. It is
> like he creates a bookmark for each Google results.
>
> What do you think about that ?

So, has every browser in the world a "separate agreement" with google to 
provide a google search bar??
No workaround here. GoogleRunner as we thought about. Take a look at searchbar 
code in rekonq 0.1.

-- 
Andrea Diamantini,
rekonq project
WEB: http://rekonq.sourceforge.net
IRC: adjam_AT_freenode
GPG Fingerprint: 57DE 8E32 7D1A 0E16 AA52 59D8 84F9 3ECD DBF9 730F


More information about the rekonq mailing list