[rekonq] Back from holidays

Domrachev Alexandr alexandr.domrachev at gmail.com
Sat Apr 18 12:46:25 CEST 2009


On 18 апреля 2009 14:07:06 Domrachev Alexandr wrote:
> On 18 апреля 2009 04:33:16 Andrea Diamantini wrote:
> > I've seen this "new" issue tracker, but I really don't understand. Why do
> > we need this? Have you ever tried sourceforge's one?
> > And why google's is better?
>
> Yes, I've worked with sf one - I just don't like. Google code is faster,
> MUCH faster than sf.

And in sf tracker there is just one bug report, in google code tracker we have 24 bug 
reports from 3 different authors. So no comments :)

-- 
Best regards,
	Domrachev Alexandr.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20090418/59db4f87/attachment-0001.sig 


More information about the rekonq mailing list