Synchronized release schedule for Plasma

[Ilya Bizyaev]

Hello,



I would like to clarify that Promo has not reached any consensus on whether this would be a good idea for us. With my local promo hat on, I do not think Plasma announcements should be any larger than they are now, as that puts an extra load on translators.



Best regards,

Ilya





---- Дата: Чт, 07 янв 2021 14:28:50 +0300 niccolo <niccolo at venerandi.com> написал(а) ----


Hi,

sorry to bring this up again, but I would be in favor of a switching to 2 releases every year. I'd like to add some reasons to do that on the promotional side:

1) In Promo, we are quite stepping up our game in the quality of announcements, to both the website and the release video. We are already a bit stretched out with time, and having more of that to prepare each release would benefit us, especially if we intend - and I think we do - to improve our work even further.

2)
 We have measured that doing less announcements every year usually gives
 those more engagement; we'd expect a good rise of that if we switch 
from 3 to 2 yearly.

3) Finally, we also expect higher engagement if we have more big features to promote. In all the releases I've worked on, I always felt - yes, this is subjective - that the 
changes were not quite enough to make the user go "wow" (we are 
generally talking about 2/4 big features each release). Bringing that up by ~50% would help a lot.

4)
 It is much easier to explain to the users that they are going to get 
the new features soon in an announcement, if major distributions such as
 Ubuntu and Kubuntu have the new release ready soon, rather than having to wait months to actually get them.

I
 would also suggest switching to 6 months from a developer point of 
view, but here I'd prefer to only argue the benefit in the promotional 
side, adding up to the advantage of synced release frequency with distributions. It doesn't make much sense to be annoyed 
that your changes do not reach the users in time in a 6 months release cycle, when you currently have to wait about the same amount of time, 
changing every time, before that version gets picked up by major 
distributions with most users, as said before.

Thanks,

Niccolò



p.s.: my mail could be arriving with a big delay and duplicated; if so, I'm sorry, I did some confusion with my different email addresses.



>From "Plasma-devel" mailto:plasma-devel-bounces at kde.org

To "plasma-devel" mailto:plasma-devel at kde.org

Cc mailto:kde-devel at kde.org

Date Tue, 1 Dec 2020 16:01:29 +0000

Subject Re: Synchronized release schedule for Plasma


We discussed this in the Plasma meeting on Monday and I'm afraid there's little appetite in moving to a 6 monthly release or a 3 monthly release.  We did used to have a 3 monthly schedule but that is too tight given the length of beta and freezes we want to have now.  But also 6 monthly feels too long, for distros that miss the release that become a long time that we have users on an older release.  



Having said that if there's occasions where we can shift a release a bit to help distros we're happy to do that.



Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20210107/4802ddc8/attachment.htm>