Virtual Desktop and Activities future: Partitioning proposal

[Roman Gilg]

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:01 AM Marco Martin <notmart at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On lunedì 16 luglio 2018 20:07:40 CEST Roman Gilg wrote:
> > ------------------------------
> > libtaskmanager implementation:
> > ------------------------------
> > * Listens for VD, active VD and VD identifier changes.
> > * Associates internally VDs with Activities.
>
> hmm, i feel this association would be more robust if it's in kamd?
True. libtaskmanager still needs to know which VD is associated with
which Activity (or at least with the current one) I assume. But maybe
kamd could tell this to libtaskmanager. One would probably need to
create a full data flow diagram to know if and how this could work out
in practice.