Unwritten design policy Re: D9040: Revert "[Lock Screen / Login] Add "reveal password button""

[Aleix Pol]

Would it make sense to maybe write it down now?
I wasn't aware of it and it's a good rule. It would be useful both for
documentation and to get inspired when new policies are required.

Aleix

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:49 PM, David Edmundson <
noreply at phabricator.kde.org> wrote:

> davidedmundson created this revision.
> Restricted Application added a project: Plasma.
> Restricted Application added a subscriber: plasma-devel. View Revision
> <https://phabricator.kde.org/D9040>
> *REVISION SUMMARY*
>
> Up till this commit we had an unwritten policy:
>
> If it's a shared password (wifi, printer, samba) we can reveal the password
> If it's a personal password, you cannot
>
> This commit didn't unify the workspace behaviour, but broke it from what
> we have
> elsewhere user manager and polkit.
>
> It didn't fix anything, but introduced multiple issues.
>
> BUG: 387418
> and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487169
>
> Even if we followed a kiosk restriction, I can't use that from SDDM.
>
> This reverts commit 2f9bfbc5e153cf98c33c6eebbf2859a48493f4b9.
>
> *REPOSITORY*
> R120 Plasma Workspace
>
> *BRANCH*
> master
>
> *REVISION DETAIL*
> https://phabricator.kde.org/D9040
>
> *AFFECTED FILES*
> lookandfeel/contents/lockscreen/MainBlock.qml
> sddm-theme/Login.qml
>
> *To: *davidedmundson
> *Cc: *plasma-devel, ZrenBot, progwolff, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed,
> jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20171129/d33d9a65/attachment.html>