Review Request 127963: Adding missing license

[Martin Gräßlin]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127963/#review95615
-----------------------------------------------------------



I think the approach here is wrong. Our frameworks are LGPLv2+. If we have files which don't match that we need to either change copyright or remove the files.

- Martin Gräßlin


On May 19, 2016, 4:37 p.m., Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127963/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 19, 2016, 4:37 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Plasma.
> 
> 
> Repository: plasma-framework
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> We are currently shipping an LGPL-2.1 copy in the COPYING.LIB file, but
> some parts of the code are under a LGPL-2 only license and the LGPL
> license requires shipping the full text with the source code.
> 
> The list of LGPL-2 only files is:
>  examples/kpart/containmentshell.cpp
>  examples/kpart/containmentshell.h
>  examples/kpart/main.cpp
>  examples/kpart/testshellpluginloader.cpp
>  examples/kpart/testshellpluginloader.h
>  src/kpart/plasmakpartview.cpp
>  src/kpart/scripting/rect.cpp
>  src/plasma/private/package_p.h
>  src/plasma/private/packagestructure_p.h
>  src/plasma/private/servicejob_p.h
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   COPYING.LGPL-2 PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127963/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Maximiliano Curia
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20160519/e7aa077c/attachment-0001.html>