On a backport, and backports

[Lindsay Roberts]

On 30 December 2016 at 15:26, Marco Martin <notmart at gmail.com> wrote:
> the patch you mean is https://phabricator.kde.org/D2986  ?
>
> I think it makes sense to backpport..
> also, to me backporting to 5.8 is kindof special, becuase of its lts status.
> maybe something i would not consider fto backport for a normal release, in 5.8
> makes more sense because I think every fix that makes it easier to maintain in
> the long term, makes sense


That's it, and understood.

If there are no objections then I'll backport this tonight.