Review Request 125827: Introduce WaylandLocker for ksld

[David Edmundson]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125827/#review87503
-----------------------------------------------------------



ksmserver/screenlocker/ksldapp.cpp (line 145)
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125827/#comment60081>

    it's better to do
    
    if(X) {
     xThing
    }
    
    rather than if (!wayland) {
     xThing
    }
    
    will ease any future porting.


- David Edmundson


On Oct. 27, 2015, 10:51 a.m., Bhushan Shah wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125827/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 27, 2015, 10:51 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Plasma and Martin Gräßlin.
> 
> 
> Repository: plasma-workspace
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> At this moment WaylandLocker is just no-op, but X11Locker being highly X dependant this provides default implementation for lockwindow.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ksmserver/screenlocker/CMakeLists.txt 367e81e 
>   ksmserver/screenlocker/ksldapp.cpp f5dd998 
>   ksmserver/screenlocker/waylandlocker.h PRE-CREATION 
>   ksmserver/screenlocker/waylandlocker.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125827/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> works : http://i.imgur.com/d0ZCuO7.png
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bhushan Shah
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20151027/33e5acc8/attachment-0001.html>