Review Request 126037: Drop setuid of `kcheckpass`/Use LIBEXEC_INSTALL_DIR wherever appropriate
Elias Probst
mail at eliasprobst.eu
Thu Nov 12 08:23:51 UTC 2015
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126037/
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated Nov. 12, 2015, 8:23 a.m.)
Status
------
This change has been discarded.
Review request for Plasma, Bhushan Shah and Martin Gräßlin.
Repository: kscreenlocker
Description
-------
Drop obsolete 'setuid' of kcheckpass and fragile code using $ENV{DESTDIR}.
kcheckpass works just fine without setuid nowadays and quite a few
distributions already dropped setuid of if since quite some time.
Also use `LIBEXEC_INSTALL_DIR` instead of one of the dozens of other variants for consistency.
Diffs
-----
config-kscreenlocker.h.cmake 2a034dee8ec21e426bc1db1d56b0ed152d3de2ca
greeter/CMakeLists.txt 317bfa3cdadf05a9a8597ed40a3dc3c0af4d144d
kcheckpass/CMakeLists.txt a63fa1403e897e70989dc2e1ba7eed4bc69cbb51
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126037/diff/
Testing
-------
`kcheckpass` and `kscreenlocker_greet` end up in the expected target directory (`/usr/lib64/libexec` on Gentoo). `kcheckpass` works as expected.
I'm not sure yet about `kscreenlocker_greet` as I ended up with an un-unlockable session but also saw this issue before.
Thanks,
Elias Probst
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20151112/c67107c8/attachment.html>
More information about the Plasma-devel
mailing list