Review Request 124485: Add missing traffic monitor

[Jan Grulich]

> On Čec. 27, 2015, 10:47 dop., Heiko Tietze wrote:
> > Why are the graphs such unrealistic shaped? Looks like heavy filtering. If Thomas and Jens granted usability I will check the ship it here. But please discuss also the scaling method. When it is adopted to the current speed the actual graph is not really informative; if the y-axis' scaling is fix to the max. bandwidth it might be a problem in case of other bottlenecks. I suggest to (optionally) scale by the max measured value therefore.

That's the way how it's implemented in KDeclarative framework, I don't know if it's possible to change it and I don't have knowledge to do it myself. It scales according to the maximal visible value of the graph.


- Jan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124485/#review83033
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Čec. 27, 2015, 10:17 dop., Jan Grulich wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124485/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Čec. 27, 2015, 10:17 dop.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Network Management, Plasma and KDE Usability.
> 
> 
> Bugs: 268022
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268022
> 
> 
> Repository: plasma-nm
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   applet/contents/ui/ConnectionItem.qml ff722a7 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124485/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ![Traffic monitor](https://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/plotter.png)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jan Grulich
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20150727/44a87a5d/attachment.html>