Review Request 122696: Bump the version of the QML import

[Martin Klapetek]

> On Feb. 24, 2015, 12:01 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > if all imports ni the repo are raised even if there is no new api, may be less confising? (or some day there will be a ton of different versions)
> 
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>     my suggestion would be to raise with maybe each framework release independent on whether new api is added or not.
> 
> Marco Martin wrote:
>     +1

Well then what should I do? Raise all those "2, 0" to "2, 1"?


- Martin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122696/#review76537
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 24, 2015, 11:58 a.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122696/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 24, 2015, 11:58 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Plasma.
> 
> 
> Repository: plasma-framework
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Now I don't know if bumping just this one is good/enough or if all of them should be raised. Please advise.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/declarativeimports/core/datamodel.h 3b3ca75 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122696/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Martin Klapetek
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20150224/b7724adb/attachment.html>