Review Request 117894: Add a kscreenlocker_test test application

[Martin Gräßlin]

> On May 1, 2014, 7 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > The greeter is invokable on it's own anyway, what benefit does this have?

I think you misunderstood: it's not to run the greeter but the server part in ksmserver which holds the X11 lock.


- Martin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117894/#review57069
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 30, 2014, 11:44 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117894/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 30, 2014, 11:44 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Plasma, David Edmundson and Wolfgang Bauer.
> 
> 
> Repository: plasma-workspace
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add a kscreenlocker_test test application
> 
> The idea is to have a small test application for the screenlocker part
> to test without having to restart ksmserver.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ksmserver/screenlocker/CMakeLists.txt 700cdff95f46125952ab2503bb125c5b6cd3ce67 
>   ksmserver/screenlocker/tests/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION 
>   ksmserver/screenlocker/tests/kscreenlocker_main.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117894/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Martin Gräßlin
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20140504/fde3c461/attachment.html>