Review Request 119089: Use appropiate licensed files for modeltest

[Giorgos Tsiapaliokas]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119089/#review61508
-----------------------------------------------------------


+1 from me but I would like someone else to have a look at it since I am not an expert on licensing.
Comparing it with the original the only difference is that copyrights doesn't match and I don't know if
they should match or not.

- Giorgos Tsiapaliokas


On July 2, 2014, 9:28 p.m., David Suárez wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119089/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 2, 2014, 9:28 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Plasma.
> 
> 
> Repository: plasmate
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Use appropiate licensed files for modeltest to comply with dfsg.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   plasmate/modeltest/dynamictreemodel.h 9633755 
>   plasmate/modeltest/dynamictreemodel.cpp fa634b6 
>   plasmate/modeltest/modeltest.h 52b45d9 
>   plasmate/modeltest/modeltest.cpp 98d707c 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119089/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Not needed, it didn't touch any code.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David Suárez
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20140702/07848c17/attachment.html>