Release schedule for Plasma Next

[Martin Graesslin]

On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:00:17 Eike Hein wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 January 2014 15:53:21 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Let's aim for one week, we can delay the Alpha if need be, but
> > realistically, we should only integrate things that are really done. Ways
> 
> > to make the post- feature-freeze week not cause havoc:
> One week (rather than the three days in the original timeline)
> feels good, +1.

Do we really need this one week in between? Just tag and release on the day of 
feature freeze. It's the responsibility of all of us to not screw up. Why add 
to the release schedule the possibility to screw up? We are giving out the 
hint that "it doesn't matter if you push your feature have finished, you have 
another week to fix it". We want an always releasable master, thus we don't 
want people to continue to do that. Features should be pushed if they are done 
and not half finished.

Cheers
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20140129/22f76f1e/attachment.sig>