[kde-promo] Plasma Next Naming - Take 2

[Albert Astals Cid]

El Dilluns, 27 de gener de 2014, a les 15:05:43, Jos Poortvliet va escriure:
> On Monday 27 January 2014 14:37:03 Martin Klapetek wrote:
> > Hey all,
> > 
> > I've processed the discussion in the previous thread, we discussed it a
> > bit
> > in today's Plasma Monday hangout and here is a reiteration of the naming
> > proposal. Please please /always/ keep plasma-devel in CC, if not, I'll
> > hunt you down at Akademy and give you a disapproving look.
> > 
> > Alright, here it is:
> >  * The press/promo name of the workspace and close friends release will be
> > 
> > "Plasma" with the "by KDE" touch, it should never appear as "KDE Plasma"
> > again in our articles/blogs, nor just "KDE" when referring to the
> > workspace
> > * Versioning will be the date, eg. "Plasma 2014.06" (please refer to the
> > previous thread for details on "why the date and not "5" and/or "2").
> > Updates to those releases will be in form of "2nd update to Plasma
> > 2014.06". The minor version also needs to be appended to the date, mainly
> > for packagers, so we advise "2014.06-2". Exact date scheme is yet to be
> > determined, comments on that welcome
> 
> I recall seeing -x often as distro-package-versions, so 2014.06.2 might be
> better. Then the fourth packaging of 2014.06.2 will be 2014.06.2-4.

Just after reading the email I also thought that 2014.06.2 looks "more 
consistent" than 2014.06-2, on the other hand 2014.06.2 may "easily" be 
confused with a date while 2014.06-2 not so much, so I'm not really sure what 
I like better :D

Cheers,
  Albert

P.S: Yes I know, this email probably wasn't very useful :D