Thoughts about a better Quality Management process for Plasma

[Martin Gräßlin]

On Monday 14 January 2013 11:42:10 Alex Merry wrote:
> On 14/01/13 10:22, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > I think this would also be interesting for Plasma:
> > * which Plasmoids are running
> > * which containments are present
> > * what are the settings of each Plasmoid
> 
> Note that there are potential privacy issues here. Unlike KWin, there is
> a fair chance that plasmoid configurations may contain personal
> information - particularly if there are sticky notes, for example.
good point! The way how we did this in KWin should also work for the privacy 
relevant issue. In KWin we just defined all settings as Q_PROPERTIES, so all 
that is needed is to not define the property for sensitive data elements (and 
document why the one is missing).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20130114/a238978f/attachment.sig>