reflecting on 4.10
Andreas Demmer
mail at andreas-demmer.de
Fri Jan 11 12:34:22 UTC 2013
Hi!
> so how do you think 4.10 went?
I was not involved deeply in this release and did not contribute anything
besides some hopefully insightful bug reports.
> what do you feel are the "defining" accomplishments for the desktop
> workspace in 4.10? (e.g. the positive things people will talk about when
> they get 4.10 on their machines)
They will talk about the new artwork (plasma theme + wallpaper) for sure. I do
not think that the impact of the QtQuick transition will be too obvious
despite the new and sleeker look of some plasmoids.
> what do you personally like about the results of 4.10?
I *love* the new appmenu! Once enabled, all apps suddenly do look a lot more
simplistic!
> what, if anything, did you not like about the 4.10 development cycle?
Some major regressions were introduced that could have been discovered before
merging, i.e. partly broken shadows and OSD transparency.
> what, if anything, would you like to be done the same way in 4.11?
I like that developers also focus on changes "under the hood" that may stay
unnoticed but are a big invest into KDEs future.
> what, if anything, would you like to be done differently in 4.11?
Some features should be merged after "the extra mile" or stay at least hidden.
As much as I love KDE for its vast feature-richness, I am always a little said
that new KDE releases have obvious visual glitches that may raise the
impression of a lack of loving details which is not the truth.
Yours,
Andreas
--
http://www.andreas-demmer.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20130111/bf9c825c/attachment.sig>
More information about the Plasma-devel
mailing list