Doxyqml, supporting type

[Marco Martin]

On Tuesday 23 October 2012, Aleix Pol wrote:

> 
> More seriously though, I think that a patch on some current code would
> be really helpful.
> 
> Also did we consider how different will be C++ components vs. QML
> components? Ideally they should have a similar aspect since we'll
> likely be using them both together.

the c++ ones right now are harvested by doxygen, but the look is quite 
horrible:
http://api.kde.org/4.x-api/kde-runtime-
apidocs/plasma/html/classPlasma_1_1FrameSvgItem.html

(ideally all the functions that are not slots/invokable/scriptable should not 
appear there)
the documentation of the properties are drowned in the enumeration of 
undocumented functions right now (and that should remain undocumented, since 
they are either just setter/getter of documented properties or functions not 
invokable from qml)

Cheers,
Marco Martin