RFC: Activities vs Virtual Desktop document on the wiki

[Ivan Čukić]

> Given the result of the tree game, it is very clear to me that implementing
> this feature is not worth the effort.

Can you elaborate on the tree game? And what were the conclusions
regarding activities in general, and activities+VDs.

This is not really useful for those of us who weren't at the sprint:
http://community.kde.org/Plasma/Workspace_Sprint/Games/ProductTreeSummary

> As I know that this would be very
> complex and error prone I would veto any attempt to implement it :-)

I agree that it would be a rather problematic thing that would have *a
lot* of problems, but if somebody spent 6 months on that and provide a
bug-free patch that works even in unimaginable corner cases (the ideal
world scenario) - would you still veto it? :) (just want to see how
hard is the veto, I'm not willing to spend 6 months on that project)


-- 
Cheerio,
Ivan

--
While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words
Dying to believe in what you heard
I was staring straight into the shining sun