Create new bugzilla components for the dataengines??

[Gregor Tätzner]

Am Montag, 28. November 2011, 11:04:17 schrieb todd rme:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas
> 
> <terietor at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > do you believe that some new bugzilla components for the dataengines
> > that could be helpful?
> > In order to split the bugs of the dataengines from the bugs of the
> > plasmoids.
> > 
> > A few pros and cons that i could think of.
> > 
> > Pros
> > It would be easier for the contributors to track down the issue.
> > The dataengines doesn't live in the same dir with the plasmoids.
> > 
> > Also for some plasmoids that use the same dataengine it would be
> > "nicer" to have the bugs of the dataengines seperate.
> > 
> > Cons
> > Someone has to do it.
> > 
> > What do you think?+1 -1
> 
> I doubt most users would be able to tell whether a problem lies with a
> dataengine or with a plasmoid, and having it might lead to them
> incorrectly attributing it to one or the other.  On the other hand, it
> could help with bug tracking if developers could re-assign bugs to
> dataengines.  So there are pros and cons in my opinion, and I wouldn't
> know which weighs more heavily in this case.
> 
> -Todd
> _______________________________________________
> Plasma-devel mailing list
> Plasma-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

-1 I think Todd is right. Someone needs to clean up the mess and re-assign the 
bugs to the correct component. Unnecessary complexity I would say.

Greg

-- 
somebody was calculating pi on the server
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20111128/8a5e3d26/attachment-0001.sig>