GSoC proposal: First draft

[Hayri Bakici]

I think it's pretty good. You pointed out the reasons of your doings,
which imo are really important. Last year, I wrote two use cases in my
proposal, however I don't know if something like that really fits in
yours.

cheers

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Viranch Mehta <viranch.mehta at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Sebastian Kügler <sebas at kde.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, March 11, 2011 19:28:13 todd rme wrote:
>> > Might it be good to start with the ones that are already in-progress,
>> > that way you can directly compare the the existing plasmoid code and
>> > the QML code and thus, hopefully, get a feel for how to do the
>> > porting?
>>
>> But the ones which are in progress are possibly the ones which get done,
>> anyway. I don't think it's a good idea to put a GSoC student onto
>> something
>> people are already working on.
>
> I think I can look through some on-going work and possibly write some
> patches for getting familiar.
> Another question: All the QML plasmoids are currently in playground, right?
> Viranch
> _______________________________________________
> Plasma-devel mailing list
> Plasma-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
>
>