dah-dah-da-daaaaah! synchrotron!

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Thursday, January 6, 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday, January 6, 2011, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
> > I´m not sure a batch update call is really needed because this call would
> > have a very low cache hit rate on the server compared with atomic checks
> > for single plasmoids.
> > 
> > But a batch check call could be added to the next version of the spec of
> > course if it makes sense.
> 
> yes, it's the check call that would benefit from being batched, since it
> determines if any ations need to be taken, and updates will be infrequent
> relative to checks for available updates.

that was pretty easy. the list command in synchrotron now supports (the non-
standard) createdsince and updatedsince optional parameters which restricts 
listings as one would expect. both take a seconds-since-the-epoch timestamp.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20110106/010113e7/attachment.sig