[RFC] Enforcing Compositing

[Davide Bettio]

Hi,

On 02/20/11 22:06, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>> I can't understand the point about removing enable/disable options.
> if we don't want to give the user the possibility to disable, we don't need an 
> option to enable/disable.
>
I don't see anything bad about having enable/disable options on the KCM.
The only con that I'm aware of is that we have more checkboxes.
> Let's turn the question around: why should the user be able to enable or 
> disable compositing? What would be a valid reason to do so? And keep in mind: 
> with Wayland it will be impossible to turn off compositing, same in GNOME 
> Shell, Unity and Mac OS X (don't know about Windows).
The main reason is that buggy software is still around.

Bye,
Davide Bettio.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 900 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20110220/0ac5a2d5/attachment.sig